New York Objections

Description

“There are numerous treatises, books and articles on evidence and trial tactics, which include coverage of making and responding to objections. However, few publications combine these subjects in as clear and useful a way as New York Objections.”  —David M. Epstein, New York Law Journal

Specially Designed for Courtroom Use

Winning at trial means getting your evidence in and keeping the opposition’s evidence out — or at least minimizing its impact. Most evidentiary rulings are within the judge’s discretion, and are made in seconds. Bad rulings are almost never reversible. In sum, victory goes to the lawyer who can prevail on the big objections in the heat of battle. The key is knowing why, when and how to object and how to respond — at a moment’s notice — with supporting authority at your fingertips. That’s where New York Objections comes in. Like no other resource, New York Objections uses a courtroom-friendly format to cover more than 100 trial objections with clear, concise explanations, practice tips, and cautions — plus the rules, statutes, and cases that comprise and construe New York’s rules of evidence.

Pattern Objections

Model language for more than 100 objections. Use the language provided — or tailor it to fit your specific situation. You can turn to the model language you need in seconds.

Comments

Author comments are included for each objection. The authors explain the practical application, scope, and purpose of the governing rules, and describe the circumstances in which each objection is proper and most effective.

Practice Tips & Cautions

The text includes an abundance of practice tips and cautions, alerting you to common mistakes and important strategies.

Cases

The facts and holdings of 1500 cases (about 15 per objection) are summarized so you can quickly find supporting authority.

Response

Opposing counsel objects — and thanks to New York Objections, you have the ammunition to respond. Better yet, you know how to anticipate and preclude objections before they are made. You also know what reactions to expect from the judge, how to meet alternative admission procedures, and more.

Foundation

New York Objections tells you how to meet the foundation requirements for specific types of evidence. You’ll find instructions on how to lay your foundation and spot weaknesses in your opponent’s.

Tactics

Anticipate evidence problems and plan your strategies. The authors’ advice and insights from the bench give you the best chance of success. They include alternative arguments, judicial perspectives and preferences, and what you need to put on the record.

New York attorneys must marshal far-flung rules, statutory provisions, and ever-developing common law. Other evidence books are full-blown academic treatises — not well-suited for handling courtroom exigencies. New York Objections bridges the gap. Organized by topic, it explains New York’s evidence rules, citing all the state’s relevant rules, statutes, and more than 1,500 New York cases directly on point. Don’t let opposing counsel’s objection block the admission of critical evidence, and don’t be caught off guard when opposing counsel offers evidence you could have kept out, had you just made the proper objection. Whether you’re in the courtroom or preparing for trial, New York Objections will help you use the rules of evidence to your best advantage. Written by respected New York trial judges, this book has the most comprehensive coverage of New York objections ever published. New York Objections is what you need to:

• Preclude trial objections through motions in limine.
• Evaluate the admissibility of the opposition’s evidence.
• Decide when to object, and when to remain silent.
• Preserve the record for appeal.
• Respond to objections — on the spot, and with authority.
• Draft briefs on evidentiary objections and motions.
• Prevent jury exposure to adverse inadmissible evidence.

REVISION 21 HIGHLIGHTS

In this 21st Edition of New York Objections, Justice Gerald Lebovits has updated every chapter in the book with  new and revised text and dozens of new citations to authority, including new cases on a broad range of topics,  from Attorney Conduct to Photographs to Witness Competence. The new text and cases cover objections and  evidence related to:  

• Opening Statements: erroneous matter; inflammatory statements. 
• Hearsay: testimonial hearsay in criminal prosecutions; police involvement; expert testimony; CPL 670.10; prior inconsistent statements; business, hospital, and police records; admissibility. 
• Privileges: attorney-client; physician-patient; attorney work product. 
• Real Evidence: chain of custody; exhibition of person. 
• Documents: rules and admissibility; electronic business records; best evidence rule; business records;  electronic evidence. 
• Photographs: photo of victim; photo of crime scene; photo of defendant. 
• Witness Competence: judge as a witness; lack of personal knowledge. 
• Witness Examination: direct examination; cross-examination; impeaching own witness.
• Expert Testimony: accident reconstruction; cocaine analysis; eyewitness identification, false confessions;  medicine; police; sexual abuse; examining expert witness at trial; medical testimony not admissible; the Frye standard; blood alcohol content; DNA testing. 
• Judicial Conduct: discretion to regulate trial; removing the defendant from courtroom; judicial notice.
• • Summation: matters not in evidence; personal attacks; appeals to sympathy; unit of time as measure of damages. 
• Submission to Jury: jury questions and read-back requests; juror conduct. 

PLUS a new section on Presumptions, including an overview of the governing law and case examples re:  · Burden of proof – rebuttal of presumption 

• Specific presumption – against suicide 
• Specific presumption – knowledge of the law 
• Specific presumption – legitimacy 
• Specific presumption – negligence in rear-end collision 
• Specific presumption – owner’s permission to operate vehicle 
• Specific presumption – proper execution of will 
• Specific presumption – proper service 
• Specific presumption – receipt of mailing 
• Specific presumption – regularity 
• Specific presumption – spoliation 
• Specific presumption – suggestive photo array

ABBREVIATED TABLE OF CONTENTS

CH. 1 OBJECTIONS & RELATED PROCEDURES

CH. 2 JURY SELECTION

CH. 3 OPENING STATEMENT

CH. 4 RELEVANCE & MATERIALITY

CH. 5 HEARSAY

CH. 6 CONFUSING, PREJUDICIAL, & CUMULATIVE

CH. 7 PRIVILEGES

CH. 8 CHARACTER & HABIT

CH. 9 REAL EVIDENCE

CH. 10 PHOTOGRAPHS, RECORDINGS, & X-RAYS

CH. 11 DOCUMENTS

CH. 12 PAROL EVIDENCE

CH. 13 DEMONSTRATIVE EVIDENCE

CH. 14 WITNESS COMPETENCE

CH. 15 WITNESS EXAMINATION

CH. 16 EXPERT WITNESSES

CH. 17 JUDICIAL CONDUCT

CH. 18 ATTORNEY CONDUCT

CH. 19 SUMMATION

CH. 20 SUBMISSION TO JURY

CH. 21 OBJECTING DURING DEPOSITIONS

ABOUT THE AUTHORS

Justice Gerald Lebovits began writing the annual supplements to New York Objections in 2018. Each year, he updates every chapter and adds dozens of new case citations throughout the book.

Justice Lebovits has been a New York City judge since 2001. An acting Supreme Court justice in Manhattan, he is president of the 300-judge New York State Association of Acting Supreme Court Justices. Before that he was president of the 120-judge Board of Judges of the New York City Civil Court and the 50-judge New York City Association of Housing Court Judges. Justice Lebovits has been an adjunct professor of law for 32 years, currently at Columbia, Fordham, and NYU. The students at Fordham, New York Law School, and St. John’s have each elected him Adjunct Law Professor of the Year. Justice Lebovits has a B.A. in law (1976), two certificates in law (1978), and a license in law (1979) from Canada (where he is from), and two graduate law degrees, from Tulane (1980) and NYU (1986), in the United States.

Justice Lebovits gratefully acknowledges the intelligent work of Julian Rodriguez, who contributed research to every chapter, adding cases and comments. Mr. Rodriguez is an associate at Greenberg Traurig, LLP., specializing in commercial real estate litigation. Mr. Rodriguez graduated with honors from St. John’s University School of Law in 2015, where he served on the Law Review. He is a 2012 honors graduate of SUNY Binghamton University.

Justice Helen E. Freedman wrote the first edition of New York Objections in 1998 and updated the work annually through 2015.