Texas Criminal Forms

Description

Effective, Efficient Criminal Defense

A timesaving combination of forms and law from two of the state’s preeminent authorities.

Judge Robert K. Gill and Mark Daniel’s formbook will help you deal with ever-increasing pressures to do more in less time.

Texas Criminal Forms provides forms, tips, and law to improve your effectiveness and efficiency in everything from evidence suppression through trial to sentencing.  For example, you receive:

• 4 motions to suppress evidence seized from places.  “It is generally better to not allege specific grounds to avoid warning the prosecution which grounds will be pursued at the hearing. The above-listed grounds can serve as a guide for questioning of prosecution witnesses at the suppression hearing or for tailoring a specific motion if the facts require specificity.”  Text §§2:01-21, Forms 2-2 to 2-5
• 2 motions to reveal identity of informer.  “Even if the state is not ultimately required to reveal identity, the hearing on the motion can be an excellent discovery device and can coerce the state into dismissal or a favorable plea.” Text §§2:40-45, Forms 2-6 and 2-7
• 10 motions to suppress evidence seized from persons.  “Another benefit to requiring the trial court to hear testimony on a motion to suppress evidence is to discover what the testimony of the involved law enforcement agents will be at trial. At the hearing counsel can lock in their testimony on crucial points.”  Text §§3:01-31, Forms 3-2 to 3-5 and 3-7 to 3-12
• 7 Sixth Amendment motions.  “Although the accused has had counsel appointed for a particular offense his right to counsel often has not been properly invoked as to other offenses.  In this situation it is important to make sure that there is also a Fifth Amendment invocation by the defendant.”  Text §§4:01-43, Forms 4-1 to 4-2 and 4-13 to 4-17
• 15 Fifth Amendment motions.  “If counsel seeks to suppress a defendant’s statement it is enough to show a violation of Miranda or Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 38.22. However, if counsel is seeking also to suppress evidence obtained through the taking of the defendant’s statement, actual coercion by government agents must be shown.”  Text §§5:01-103, Forms 5-4 to 5-6 and 5-10 to 5-21
• 7 applications for writ of habeas corpus.  “Because collateral estoppel claims are not cognizable on a pre-trial writ of habeas corpus absent an accompanying constitutional double jeopardy claim, counsel should always couple the collateral estoppel claim with a constitutional double jeopardy claim.”  Text §§8:01-33, Forms 8-1 to 8-4 and 8-10 to 8-12
• 11 bond motions and writs.  “Since bonds can be forfeited or declared insufficient so readily, it is often necessary for the counsel for the defendant be prepared on short notice to show the trial court good cause for the bond to be reinstated or to that the defendant was arrested in error.”  Text §§9:01-52, Forms 9-1 to 9-4, 9-6 to 9-10, and 9-12 and 13
• 32 pretrial motions.  “Before pursuing the motion to testify free of impeachment by prior convictions, counsel should deliver a request to the state that they give notice under Rule 609 of any prior conviction they intend to use to impeach the defendant at trial.”  Text §§12:01-191, Forms 12-1 to 12-32
• 25 discovery motions and requests.  “Because Rule 902(10)a states that proper notice is required before business records can be admitted at trial without a sponsoring witness, counsel may wish to delete this part of the request for notice in anticipation that the other party will fail to give the required notice, thus failing the predicate.”  Text §§13:01-222, Forms 13-1 to 13-7, 13-13 to 13-31
• 18 jury forms.  “In order to preserve error in a trial court’s erroneous denial of a defense challenge for cause, the defendant must follow a rigorous predicate including….”  Text §§14:01-91, Forms 14-1 to 14-18
• 16 limiting instructions.  “Requesting a limiting instruction gives opposing counsel another forum in which to explain to the trial court the reason to sustain the original objection to the proposed evidence; and gives an opportunity to make further objections to the evidence.”  Text §§15:140-59, Forms 15-24 to 15-32 and 15-35 to 15-41
• 30 trial motions.  “There is a three-step procedure for preserving error when a subpoenaed witness does not appear. First….”  Text §§15:1-312, Forms 15-3 to15- 22 and 15-42 to 15-63
• 16 punishment motions.  “As a general proposition, a defendant must object to terms and conditions of community supervision at the time they are imposed in order to challenge the same on appeal. However, the defendant can challenge the terms and conditions by way of a habeas corpus petition. This is true even for defendants on deferred adjudication community supervision.  [Citations omitted.]”  Text §§20:1-151, Forms 20-1 to 20-10 and 20-25 to 20-33

And these specialty forms…

• 15 for DWI.  Chapter 10
• 15 for child abuse.  Chapter 17
• 18 for sex offender registration.  Chapter 18

REVISION 18 HIGHLIGHTS

In this edition of Texas Criminal Forms, you receive statutory and case law updates throughout the book, plus 9 new forms to help you navigate the issues that may arise at various stages of a criminal case. The new text and forms cover a broad range of topics, including:

RIGHT TO COUNSEL

• Indigent defendants and court appointed attorneys – non-death penalty cases
• New Form: Motion for Faretta Hearing for Defendant to Waive Right to Counsel

BAIL AND BOND MOTIONS

• Release on bond of certain persons arrested without a warrant
• Modification of bond conditions:
• Indigent defendant – offense involving family violence
• Not in best interest of justice – motor vehicle ignition interlock
• New Form: Defendant’s Motion to Modify Bond Conditions (GPS Monitoring)

PRETRIAL MOTIONS

• Pre- and post-trial protective orders
• New Form: Motion to Quash Indictment (Stalking Case)

DISCOVERY MOTIONS

• Extraneous offenses – family violence cases
• New Form: Motion for Approval of Funds for Expert in Forensic Pathology
• New Form: Motion for Approval of Funds for Forensic Psychologist

JURY SELECTION AND VOIR DIRE

• Motion For Individual Voir Dire Examination on Issue of Publicity

TRIAL MOTIONS

• Recusal and disqualification – authority of trial judges
• New Form: Motion Challenging Authority of Trial Judge and Objection to Assigned Trial Judge
• New Form: Application for Bench Warrant

POST-TRIAL PROCEEDINGS

• New Form: Notice of Appeal to Court of Criminal Appeals
• New Form: Notice of Appeal in Juvenile Case

Statutory Updates on numerous issues related to:

• Client Relations and Communications
• Self-Incrimination
• Motions Related to Searches of Places
• Motions Related to Defendant’s Statements
• Motions for DWI Cases
• Punishment Phase

AND MORE!

ABOUT THE AUTHORS

Bob Gill is a criminal defense attorney with the firm of Gill and Brissette in Fort Worth, Texas. He previously served as judge of the 213th District Court of Tarrant County, presiding over felony criminal cases for more than fourteen years. While on the bench, Judge Gill served Tarrant County as presiding criminal judge, juvenile board chairman, and twice served as the local administrative judge. Before and after his time on the bench, Judge Gill served as an assistant criminal district attorney in Tarrant County for a combined seventeen years.

Judge Gill has been Board Certified in Criminal Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization since 1988. He is a member of the State Bar of Texas, the Tarrant County Bar Association and the Tarrant County Criminal Defense Lawyers Association. He has written and lectured extensively on criminal law topics.

Mark G. Daniel practices with the Fort Worth office of Evans, Daniel, Moore, Evans & Biggs. A former Assistant District Attorney in Tarrant County, Mr. Daniel has been in private practice since 1983 devoting his practice of criminal defense at the trial court level. He was named Lawyer of the Year by the Texas Criminal Defense Lawyers Association for 2009.

Mr. Daniel is past president of the Tarrant County Criminal Defense Lawyers Association (1991) and the Texas Criminal Defense Lawyers Association (2002-2003). He served as President of the Tarrant County Bar Association for the 2006-2007 bar year.

Mr. Daniel is Board Certified in criminal law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization and the National Board of Trial Advocacy. He is also a frequent author and speaker on criminal law topics including defending capital murder cases, pre-trial motions, cross-examination, forfeitures, expert witnesses, privileges and punishment hearings.