Defense Expert Testimony in Pistorius Trial Discounted as Unreliable | Free Form Inside!
In the trial of Oscar Pistorius, the South African Olympian accused of murdering his model girlfriend, media and the prosecution severely reproached an expert witness for providing unsubstantiated expert testimony.
Pistorius Defense Team’s Expert Testimony Contradicts Elements of Athlete’s Story
Expert witness Roger Dixon, a former policeman whose expertise lies in forensic geology, reportedly testified in court regarding subjects ranging from sound analysis to the wounds found on the body of Pistorius’ girlfriend, Reeva Steenkamp. Dixon’s expert testimony contradicted the athlete’s version of events regarding the night of Steenkamp’s death; in one instance, the geologist stated that the evidence proved that a magazine stand could not have been sitting where the athlete claimed it had been during the incident.
Dixon did support the defense’s claims that Pistorius had struck the bathroom door with his prosthetic leg. Yet, Dixon later admitted that he had come to the conclusion based solely upon photographic evidence rather than scientific analysis.
How to Uncover Witnesses’ True Expertise
Uncovering when an expert testimony is unreliable can be challenging, but it is possible with the right information such as the material found in Exposing Deceptive Defense Doctors.
According to Exposing Deceptive Defense Doctors, one strategy that legal professionals could employ when assessing expert testimony during personal injury cases is to examine their educational and professional backgrounds. For instance, a chemist might possess a Harvard degree in chemistry and significant professional experience, but this does not mean that he or she is qualified to testify regarding medical evidence or autopsy results.
Undermining the Credibility of an Expert Testimony
Questioning witnesses directly and aggressively can sometimes be the best way to uncover the breadth of their expertise. Oftentimes, this line of questioning can lead into an analysis of the subject areas that the witness is unfamiliar with and the unreliability of his or her conclusions.
This free form, excerpted from Exposing Deceptive Defense Doctors, will help you strike defense expert testimony.
Invaluable Information Available at Your Fingertips
Exposing Deceptive Defense Doctors gives you tactics, questions, arguments, and forms from a lawyer who has made a specialty out of deposing defense doctors for other attorneys. This book will enable you to reveal 
dishonesty, bias, over-reaching, and incompetence by defense doctors in multiple specialties.
Some defense doctors manipulate exams and spin the science. Luckily, their defenses are quite predictable, and can be readily dealt with once you learn how to recognize and counter them. Dorothy Clay Sims explains how, revealing the games DMEs play and showing you proven techniques and questions for making juries angry at the misrepresentation. This book exposes DME defense tactics, explains where they are vulnerable, provides citations to the underlying research, and then gives you the exact questions to use in depositions and trial examinations to exploit the weaknesses in DME testimony.
